Real-Time Performance Factors of YOLO11 on Raspberry Pi 5 under a Constrained Resource Budget: Data Protocol and Key Results

Abstract

An object detector for small smart cameras and mobile robots must fit within the resources of an onboard computer that it shares with other tasks. On a Raspberry Pi 5 with a budget of two inference threads, we study how the frame rate, latency, accuracy and heating of the YOLO11n detector are affected by the following factors: model format and numerical precision, input resolution, pipeline implementation language, and the Hailo-8L neural processing unit. Particular attention is paid to the data protocol. It covers forming the COCO val2017 test subset and the calibration set, aligning ground-truth annotations with detection outputs, and evaluating accuracy on small objects. A fully integer INT8 model in TensorFlow Lite with a C++ pipeline runs 3.6 times faster than the baseline Python implementation with ONNX Runtime in FP32 (17.4 vs. 4.8 fps), at a cost of 4.3 pp in mAP50–95. A 320 × 320 input gives a further 4.1-fold speedup, but mAP_S drops to 3.7 %. This drop is explained by small objects being downscaled to sizes comparable to the stride of the finest feature map. The Hailo-8L delivers 65.6 fps at 640 × 640, keeps mAP_S at the FP32 level and does not load the CPU.