Historical Prerequisites, Institutional and Evolutionary Determinants of the Formation of Ukraine's Economic System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71942/r7q7-3k73Keywords:
economic heritage, institutional structure of the economy, path dependence, centralized management, state paternalism, subjectlessness, informal institutions, deindustrialization, concentration of economic power, extractive institutionsAbstract
The article examines the historical prerequisites and institutional and evolutionary determinants that determined the specifics of the formation of the economic system of Ukraine through the prism of economic heritage and the rut effect. Particular attention is paid to the influence of the Soviet system of centralized management, state paternalism and extractive institutions on the formation of modern disparities and institutional deformations, in particular, the concentration of property, limited access to the disposal of resources, assets and benefits, the fusion of state bureaucracy and financial and industrial groups, the dominance of informal norms and practices over formal ones.
Based on an analysis of the century-long period (1920s–2020s) of the formation of Ukraine's economic system, three key stages have been identified that are fundamentally different in the content of the transformation of the industry and institutional structure: 1) Soviet state monopolism (1928–1980s), where the totalitarian state introduced union-centralized directive management and hypertrophied priority of heavy industry and the military-industrial complex; 2) market liberalization and the formation of the national economy of Ukraine (1990s–2007), when privatization in the absence of the rule of law led to the fusion of power and business, the entrenchment of extractive institutions, and the preservation of the raw material model in the interests of narrow oligarchic groups; 3) economic development in the context of global shocks and military challenges (2008–2026), when the global financial crisis, pandemic and Russian-Ukrainian war revealed institutional vulnerabilities, but European integration, digitalization and military needs and demands for the development of the defense industry became stimulants of structural restructuring.
It is substantiated that, taking into account the previous development trajectory, the main priority of national security is to overcome long-term trends in strengthening extractive institutions. The strategy for strengthening resilience and post-war reconstruction should be based on institutional transformation for innovative, competitive and sustainable development.
Downloads
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arxiv Academy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.